
Litynski tells legislators more budget cuts would be 'devastating'
April 11, 2003
KALAMAZOO -- Western Michigan University "is arguably
the most efficient university in Michigan," but further
cuts to its already low level of state support will have a devastating
impact on the University.
That's the message carried to Lansing April 2 by Interim President
Daniel M. Litynski, when he testified with four other university
presidents before the House Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee
on Higher Education. The hearing was part of the process through
which legislators will decide whether to follow Gov. Jennifer
Granholm's recommendation for a total 10 percent across-the-board
cut to the state's 15 public universities for the 2003-04 fiscal
year. At WMU, the cut would mean a loss of more than $12 million.
Complete text of Interim
President Litynski's April 2 testimony.
"Cutting an already lean organization cuts muscle and
bone," Litynski told legislators. "If not adjusted
in some way, this could cause severe reductions in faculty and
staff, possibly forcing the elimination of courses and programs
that would delay or deny the educational goals of hundreds of
Michigan citizens."
Litynski joined the presidents of Grand Valley, Lake Superior
State and Wayne State universities as well as the chancellor
of the University of Michigan-Flint in a panel presentation that
gave the presidents an opportunity to outline their schools'
needs and respond to questions from the subcommittee.
Litynski took the opportunity to point to historical inequities
in the state's appropriation formula that have resulted in underfunding
for WMU; the University's rapid recent growth, which has exacerbated
the impact of underfunding; and state data that shows WMU operating
at efficiency levels far exceeding those of its sister institutions.
Litynski noted that House Fiscal Agency data and analysis
shows WMU is the leanest of all of the state's 15 public universities
when it comes to the size of its administrative/professional
staff. While the state average staff-to-student ratio is one
administrator for every 23 students, WMU has only one administrator
for every 57 students, making its staff the leanest in the state-despite
the dramatic demands for services created by a growing student
body.
"A lean organization can be especially vulnerable in
times of budget reductions," Litynski told the subcommittee,
and he pointed to decreasing state support per student as the
factor putting WMU in peril. "Our dedicated faculty and
staff continue to shoulder heavy workloads when compared to national
statistics."
He noted that on a per-student basis, WMU, at $4,869 per student,
already receives thousands less than the average for the state's
three other "Doctoral/Research-Extensive" universities,
where per-pupil funding ranges from a high of $10,304 at Wayne
State to a low of $7,685 at Michigan State University.
And with its history of tuition restraint, WMU's combined
tuition and appropriation revenue per student is almost 40 percent
less than its peer institutions.
"We've been challenged by the budget realities of the
past," Litynski said in response to a question from Rep.
John Stewart about the idea of adjusting budget cuts this year
to begin countering past inequities, instead of doing an across-the-board
cut to higher education. "Budgets are simply a reflection
of policy. We place our money where we want to do something and
I recommend a differential cut as an acknowledgment of that."
Media contact: Matt Kurz, 269 387-8400, matt.kurz@wmich.edu
|