Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of
Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science. In K. G. Tobin
(editor), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education
(pp. 51-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Abstract
Though rooted in Piagetian research, constructivism(1) is an avenue of research
pertaining to teaching and learning that departed from the neo-Piagetian(2) mainstream
twenty years ago and has continued on a distinct path of development. The departure
was evident by the late seventies, clearly marked by two publications, Novak (1977)
and Driver & Easley (1978). For constructivists, learning is not knowledge written on,
or transplanted to, a person's mind as if the mind were a blank slate waiting to be
written on or an empty gallery waiting to be filled. Constructivists use the metaphor of
construction because it aptly summarizes the epistemological view that knowledge is
built by individuals. Since Ausubel, Novak, & Henesian (1978), theorists have argued
that the construction of new knowledge in science is strongly influenced by prior
knowledge, that is, conceptions gained prior to the point of new learning. Learning by
construction thus implies a change in prior knowledge, where change can mean
replacement, addition, or modification of extant knowledge. Learning by construction
involving change is the basis of the Posner, Hewson, & Gertzog (1982) conceptual
change model. In essence, constructivism is an epistemological model of learning, and
constructivist teaching is mediation. A constructivist teacher works at the interface
between curriculum and student to bring the two together in a way that is meaningful
for the learner.
If one carries the construction metaphor to its logical conclusion, construction
implies a foundation in addition to the studs and beams of prior knowledge. The
construction of new knowledge takes place at a construction site consisting of existing
structures standing on a foundation.(3) In other words, construction takes place in a
context - a cultural context created by, for example, social and economic class, religion,
geographical location, ethnicity, and language. This chapter begins by setting the
concept of contextual constructivism within the historical development of constructivist
theory and then examining the types of questions suggested by contextual
constructivism. Those questions are then placed in the context of an anthropological
world view theory. The chapter concludes with a discussion on the necessity of
qualitative research techniques for contextual constructivist research.
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New
York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
Ausubel, D. P. (1966). An evaluation of the BSCS approach to high school
biology. The American Biology Teacher, 27, 176-186.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Henesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A
cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Berger, P. L. (1979). The heretical imperative: Contemporary possibilities of
religious affirmation. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New
York, NY: Doubleday.
Brewer, J. & Hunt, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles.
Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture.
New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Clement, J. (1987). Overcoming students' misconceptions in physics: the role of
anchoring intuitions and analogical validity. In J. D. Novak (Ed.),
Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and
educational strategies in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University.
Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Cobern, Wm. W. (1991a). World view theory and science education research,
NARST monograph number 3. Cincinnati, OH: National Association for
Research in Science Teaching.
Cobern, Wm. W. (1991b). The natural world as understood by selected college
students: a world view methodological exploration. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science
Teaching, Lake Geneva, Wisconsin.
Cole, M. & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought, a psychological
introduction. New York: Wiley.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.
American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, UK: The Open
University Press.
Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature
related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in
Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. Eds. (1985). Children's ideas in science.
Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1985). Science education and the philosophy of science:
Twenty-five years of mutually exclusive development. School Science and
Mathematics, 85(7), 541-555.
Duschl, R. A., Hamilton, R., & Grandy, R. E. (1990). Psychology and
epistemology: Match or mismatch when applied to science education.
International Journal of Science Education, 3(12), 230-243.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Handbook
of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Interpretive research in science education, NARST
monograph, number 4. Kansas State University, KS: National Association
for Research in Science Teaching.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York,
NY: Aldine Publishing Co.
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Gunstone, R. F., White, R. T., & Fensham, P. J. (1988). Developments in style
and purpose of research on the learning of science. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 25(7), 513-529.
Hallyn, F. (1990). The poetic structure of the world: Copernicus and Kepler.
New York, NY: Zone Books.
Hawkins, D. (1983). Nature closely observed. Daedalus, 112(2), 65-89.
Heller, S. (1990). Cultural studies: eclectic and controversial mix of research
sparks a growing movement. The Chronicle of Higher Education, January,
31st.
Helm, H. & Novak, J. D., Eds. (1983). Proceedings of the first international
seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Hills, G. L. C. (1989). Students' "untutored" beliefs about natural phenomena:
primitive science or commonsense? Science Education, 73(2), 155-186.
Hills, G. L. C. & McAndrews, B. (1987). David Hawkins, critical barriers and the
education of elementary school science teachers. In J.D. Novak (Ed.),
Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions in
science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Horton, R. (1967). African traditional thought and western science. Africa, 1,
155-187.
Jacob, E. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: a review. Review of
Educational Research, 57(1), 1-50.
Jones, W. T. (1972). World views: their nature and their function. Current
Anthropology, 13(1), 79-109.
Kearney, M. (1984). World view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp Publishers,
Inc.
Kilbourn, B. (1984). World views and science teaching. In H. Munby, G.
Orpwood & T. Russell (Eds.), Seeing curriculum in a new light. Lanham,
MD: University Press of America, Inc.
Kitchener, R. F. (in press). Piaget's genetic epistemology: epistemological
implications for science education. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.),
Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and
practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an
anthropology of science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science,
21(1), 145-171.
Lawson, A. E. & Weser, J. (1990). The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about
life: effects of instruction and reasoning skills. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 27(6), 589-606.
Lederman, N. G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to
changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science. Science
Education, 70(1), 3-19.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood,
NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:
SAGE Publications.
Lythcott, L., & Duschl, R. A. (1990). Qualitative research: from methods to
conclusions. Science Education, 74(4), 445-460.
MacKay, D. M. (1974). "Comlpementarity" in scientific and theological thinking.
Zygon, 9, 225-244.
Magoon, A. J. (1977). Constructivist approaches in educational research.
Review of Educational Research, 47(4), 651-693.
Marton, F. (1988). Investigating different understandings of reality. In R. R.
Sherman & R. B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: focus
and methods. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Merchant, C. (1989). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific
revolution. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
Millar, R., Ed. (1989). Doing Science: Images of Science in Science Education.
Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
Mishler, E. G. (1979). Meaning in context: is there any other kind? Harvard
Educational Review, 49(1), 1-19.
Modgil, S. & Modgil, C., Eds. (1982). Jean Piaget: Consensus and controversy.
New York, NY: Praeger.
NARST (1991). Abstracts of presented papers. Annual meeting of the National
Association for Research in Science Teaching. Lake Geneva, WI.
Neuhaus, R. J. (1990). Joshing Richard Rorty. First Things, 8, 14-24.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press.
Novak, J. D. (1982). Psychological and epistemological alternatives to Piagetian
developmental psychology with support from empirical studies in science
education. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Jean Piaget: Consensus and
controversy. New York, NY: Praeger.
Novak, J. D., Ed. (1987). Proceedings of the second international seminar on
misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press.
Odhiambo, T. R. (1972). Understanding of science: the impact of the African
view of nature. In P. G. S. Gilbert & M. N. Lovegreen (Eds.), Science
education in Africa. London, UK: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
Ogawa, M. (1989). Beyond the tacit framework of 'science' and 'science
education' among science educators. International Journal of Science
Education, 11(3), 247-250.
Ogawa, M. (1991). Personal correspondence.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (1988). Adapting western science to traditional African culture.
International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 1-9.
Oldroyd, D. (1986). The arch of knowledge: An introductory study of the history
of the philosophy and methodology of science. New York, NY: Methuen.
Oster, F., & Reich, K. H. (1987). The challenge of competing explanations: The
development of thinking in terms of complementarity of "theories". Human
Development, 30, 178-186.
Peacocke, A. (1984). Intimations of reality: Critical realism in science and
religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Posner, G. J., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of
scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Science
Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Proper, H., Wideen, M. F., & Ivany, G. (1988). World view projected by science
teachers. Science Education, 72(5), 542-560.
Reich, K. H. (1990). The relation between science and theology: The case for
complementarity revisited. Zygon, 25(4), 369-390.
Rickman, H. P. (1988). Science and hermeneutics. Philosophy of the Social
Sciences, 20(3), 295-316.
Rigden, J. S., & Tobias, S. (1991). Tune in, turn off, drop out. The Sciences.
Rowell, J. A., Dawson, C. J., & Lyndon, H. (1990). Changing misconceptions: A
challenge to science educators. International Journal of Science Education,
12(2), 167-175.
Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. (1966). Social Class and Modes of Communication.
In A. G. Smith (Ed.), Communication and culture: Readings in the codes
of human interaction. New York, NY: Holt, (pp. 442-455).
Shapin, S. (1982). History of science and its sociological reconstruction. History
of Science, XX, 157-211.
Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and
the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Skolimowski, H. (1974). The scientific world view and the illusions of progress.
Social Research, 41, 52-82.
Smith, M. L. (1987). Publishing qualitative research. American Educational
Research Journal, 24(2), 173-183.
Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupil's understanding
of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63-82.
Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, Inc.
Staver, J. R. (1986). The constructivist epistemology of Jean Piaget: Its
philosophical roots and relevance to science teaching and learning. A
paper presented at the United States-Japan Seminar on Science Education,
Honolulu, HI.
Strike, K. A. & Posner, G. J. (in press). A revisionist theory of conceptual
change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science,
cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. Albany, NY:
State University of New York Press.
Sutton, C. (1989). Writing and reading in science: the hidden messages. In R.
Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education.
Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
Vetter, B. & Babco, E. (1987). Professional women and minorities: A manpower
data resource service. Commission on Professionals in Science and
Technology, Washington, DC.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching,
Synthese, 80(1), 121-140.
West, L. H. T. & Pines, A. L. (1983). How "rational" is rationality? Science
Education, 67(1), 37-39.
West, L. H. T., & Pines, A. L., Eds. (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual
change. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Whatley, M. H. (1989). A feeling for science: female students and biology texts.
Women's Studies International Forum, 12(3), 355-362.
Yeany, R. H. (1991). A unifying theme in science education? NARST News,
33(2), 1,3.
Request formatted copy by EMAIL. Reference SLCSP number and paper will be sent as email attachment.
Return to Theoretical Papers.
Return to SLCSP Home Page.