Carlos Fetterolf
- Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1999
The gill netting controversy was one that Michigan wanted to push very hard and Michigan did push it and they were able to get the laws changed so that there wasnt any gill netting in Lake Michigan in Michigan waters.
We killed enough lamprey and we stocked enough fish so we could have a world class fishery
.
Howard Tanner
we announced, we said were gonna manage and were gonna manage for sport fishing and these are the things were gonna do to commercial fishing. First thing we said used to be anybody that wanted a commercial license could buy one for $25. We said were gonna have limited entry. Were not going to have unlimited capitalization of this resource.
if you havent reported $5,000 average, you dont have a fishing license. When we did that, we eliminated all the tribal fishermen. Thats with hindsight an obvious mistake. Thats with hindsight, an obvious mistake. Thats when they took us to court. Thats when they won and thats why theyve been able to sustain a fishery beyond state authority today
.
Well, we got the eggs in the fall of 64 and we stocked them in the spring of 65 and we stocked them in Wilkins Creek, a tributary of Torch Lake, up in my home county of Antrum County, and Governor Romney was there with a golden bucket and I have a picture of him stocking the fish.
Wayne Tody
- Traverse City, Michigan, 1999
We banned gill nets by law and I dont think anybodys gonna revoke that law. We dont think gill nets should be used. I dont think youll get anybody to disagree with that. I hope not. But the Indians are using them in ways that we banned, what we outlawed
.
the sport fishing lobby was very strong and financed us, so obviously we were biased.
Ron Poff
when you work with commercial fishermen and any of these industries
its always tough because they are harvesters and they make a living off of it. Its not just a hobby with them
its tough and youre a regulator and you have a lot to do with the well-being of the fish population that theyre harvesting or making their money off of.
Myrl Keller
- Charlevoix, Michigan, 1999
the Great Lakes fisheries resource in terms of who really owns it its a public resource. Its owned by the public of Michigan, for instance, Michigan waters, Wisconsin, Wisconsin waters and how are we best serving that public. So thats where we kind of rewrote the whole program and took a different management philosophy
.
most of the management people in the state of Michigan for the old Department of Conservation relied heavily on what recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife actually it was the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries then had to say on various populations, fisheries populations, and how they should be managed.
Jory Jonas
- Charlevoix, Michigan, 1999
we each have different constituent groups and we have different abilities to communicate with them. We have different governments
.
once we opened up the sea to the fresh water, things started coming in. And so you had that problem to deal with and thats where the Chinook salmon came from. It was an alewife control measure. They werent trying to create a fishery or bring new things in. They had to put something in there
.
Jim Moore
- Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, 1999
In Wisconsin very much from the beginnings of trout and salmon program it was pretty clear that one way or another there was gonna probably be a commercial fishery existing with the sport fishery.
Mike Toneys
- Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, 1999
Fishermen from other states around Wisconsin have put pressure on sport fishermen here who have tried to put pressure on the DNR to get rid of the killer gill net, so its caused us a lot of headaches over the years and weve had to spend a lot of time trying to defend our position on the use of gill nets in the commercial fishery.
|