|

Candidate:
Meg Kwak
Degree of:
Doctor of Philosophy
Department: Psychology
Title: Using Bibliometric Journal Citation Analysis as
a Technique to Assess Trends in School Psychology Journal Publications
Between 1995-1999
Committee:
Dr. Kristal Ehrhardt, Chair
Dr. Alan Poling
Dr. John Austin
Dr. Sarah Summy
Dr. Millicent Perkins
Date: Monday, February 25 12:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m.
3715 Wood Hall
Abstract:
School Psychology
is a field influenced by the many different areas within psychology
and education. School psychologists respond to many challenges and when
working in the schools it is imperative that they stay abreast of the
newest research findings. In order to remain informed, as well as to
develop new knowledge, it is essential that professionals are aware
of the influences of the publications and the relative strength of specific
journals (Kawano, Kehle, Clark, & Jenson, 1993). One way to assess
publication trends is through journal citation analysis. Citation analysis
is characterized by its objective ability to highlight the ways that
information moves within and from a scientific discipline and has been
used frequently to assess such trends (e.g., Hoffman & Holbrook,
1993; Howard & Curtain, 1993). Although there are limitations to
this technique, it has been referred to as a technique that works, and
is a reliable and accurate representation of a field (Everett &
Pecotich, 1993; Lievrouw, 1990).
This project used citation analysis to assess trends in articles published
in the five major school psychology journals. Specifically, the degree
of self-citations and cross citations were found to be relatively low
compared to
findings in other areas of psychology and only one journal, SPQ, had
most of its references come from a journal that was behavior analytic
in nature. Finally, it was found that Best Practices in School Psychology
III (Thomas & Grimes, 1995) was the most often cited book, T. R.
Kratochwill was the most frequently cited author, and "School based
consultations: Theory, techniques, and research" (Gutkin &
Curtis, 1990) was the most often referenced article/book chapter.
Overall, these
data support the notion that school psychology journals are not guilty
of excessive "within journal inbreeding." The field is growing
and remains diverse in author contribution, and research and extension
to journals other than those focused simply in the field of school psychology.
Along the same lines, school psychology is a field which is maturing
into its own and able to sustain a focused group in a time when journal
publications grow.
|

Related Topics
Main
List of Archives:
Dissertation Defenses
Current
Dissertation Defenses
|