Evaluation Myths, Misconceptions, and Mistakes


IMG_0175

Slides

Video

April 17, 2012

Dr. Lori Wingate—Assistant Director, The Evaluation Center, WMU

In this Eval Café session, Lori Wingate will engage participants in a discussion of some common misunderstandings when it comes to program evaluation language and practice.  In a profession where virtually anyone can put “evaluator” on their business card, it is immensely important that we protect the integrity of the terminology we use and be conscientious about how our individual practices collectively influence the field.  We will look at some widely repeated evaluation mistakes and missteps, consider the causes and consequences of these problems, and generate ideas about we can each work to set the record straight and keep in that way. Participants are invited to bring their favorite examples of evaluation myths, misconceptions, and mistakes to enrich and broaden the discussion.

Anchor Organization Network


Evaluation Contract

April 2012 – October 2014


Sponsor

Heart of West Michigan United Way


Project staff

Stephanie Evergreen, Principal Investigator
Kelly Robertson, Co-Principal Investigator

 

Description

This external evaluation will use a developmental evaluation approach to asses the launch and growth of the Anchor Organization Network, which is community-based collaborative intended to increase the capacity of local organizations to enact systemic change throughout neighborhoods in greater Grand Rapids, Michigan. The evaluation will transition to an impact assessment to determine the extent to which AON has increased well-being and cultivated leaders in communities of color. AON intends to further increase organizational capacity through better use of funding, thus the evaluation will also examine cost-effectiveness.


Concept of Validity in the Context of Evaluation


April 10, 2012

Dr. Brooks Applegate—Professor, Educational Leadership, Research, and Technology and Director, Evaluation, Measurement, and Research, WMU

Slides

A Collaborative Partnership to Define and Measure Empowering Practice within a Domestic Violence Shelter Program





Video

Slides

April 3, 2012

Dr. Cris Sullivan— Professor, Ecological and Community Psychology and Coordinator, Violence Against Women Research and Outreach Initiative, MSU

The goal of empowerment-based programs is to help clients increase their personal, interpersonal, and political power. This talk describes a collaborative partnership with a domestic violence shelter program interested in evaluating how well they integrated the empowerment model into day-to-day service provision and whether their approach to empowerment-based service delivery was contributing to the intended “empowered outcomes” for the women with whom they work. In the presentation, I will describe how we jointly defined empowerment within this setting, how the empowerment-based practices and intended empowered outcomes were measured, and how the process has impacted the work of the advocates.