|
 |
Sample EvalCafe Event – DUPLICATE ME
Click HERE for video…
|
Insert Abstract here. Make sure to copy this Abstract and paste it into the Excerpt below. You can also click on the “W” image and delete it. This will allow you to add a new picture by clicking the “Upload/Insert” image icon above.
NOTE: Be sure to click on the “EvalCafe List” category to the right.
|
Concept of Validity in the Context of Evaluation
Click HERE for video…
|
February 28, 2012
Dr. Brooks Applegate—Professor, Educational Leadership, Research, and Technology and Director, Evaluation, Measurement, and Research, WMU
Abstract coming soon..
|
The Value of Voice: Gaining Access to Marginalized Populations
View the slides
|
February 22, 2012
Dr. Karen Vocke—Associate Professor, Department of English, WMU; and
Dr. Brooks Applegate—Professor, Educational Leadership, Research, and Technology and Director, Evaluation, Measurement, and Research, WMU
This presentation focuses on issues related to evaluating marginalized populations. For example, known challenges include access and the complicated issues of ethical representation necessary for authentic evaluation. However, critical examination shows when the evaluation process includes members of marginalized populations, results are more tangible, valid, and generalizable, with increased participation of the sample under study. Because the needs of marginalized populations are nuanced and diverse, evaluators must carefully consider the procedures and analyses involving the evaluation participants, especially the need for authentic, and not token, participation. This demonstration offers a protocol for access, collaboration, and evaluation for working with marginalized subpopulations in the K-12 setting, namely children and families of migrant farm workers and students with disabilities. Strategies will be presented for planning evaluations, accessing populations, developing survey instruments, developing a collaborative team, data collection strategies, and data analysis.
|
Rawlsian Political Analysis and its Links with Evaluation
|

Video
|
February 14, 2012
Dr. Paul Clements—Professor, Political Science and Director, MIDA Program, WMU
My forthcoming book, Rawlsian Political Analysis: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Social Science, offers a new approach to social analysis as an improvement on neoclassical economics and rational choice theory. While these approaches are based on the assumption of rational utility maximization, I follow Rawls and Kant and assume that choice is based on independent reasonable and rational capacities. I will begin this presentation by laying out the book’s principal arguments. Then I will discuss two of the book’s applications of the proposed approach that directly involve evaluation: analyses of the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh and of the ethics and politics of climate change.
|
Writing Your HSIRB Protocol and the HSIRB Review Process
Video coming soon….
|
February 7, 2011
Julia Mays—Research Compliance Coordinator, WMU
To assist you with the HSIRB protocol and review process the Research Compliance Coordinator will discuss general HSIRB processes, levels of review, how to submit, and provide examples of research to help define “human subject research” under the Federal definition. Topics will include common errors that slow down the review process from submission to approval. If you are preparing to write a HSIRB protocol please consider attending as we will discuss applications, protocol outlines, and consent document requirements.
To access forms referenced in the presentation, please go to the following link: http://www.wmich.edu/research/forms/complianceforms.html
|
Veterans: Understanding and Serving this Unique and Growing Population on Campus
Video
|
February 1, 2012
Tracey Moon—Director, Office of Military and Veterans Affairs , WMU
When evaluating veterans, it’s essential to be aware of the unique attributes of this population. This workshop will cover background information on veterans, including their strengths and struggles, and suggestions for conducting an effective data collection process. Community resources to access participants, questions to ask or avoid, and other considerations to be mindful of when interviewing both male and female service members will be discussed, as well. Participants will have a better understanding of military and veteran perspectives and will have specifics to make evaluating this diverse group more effective.
|
|
|